From the wires:

OpenAI introduces «Intelligent UI» — with more visual ChatGPT responses

With the rollout of ChatGPT-6 Sol and Luna in chat for all tiers today, OpenAI is also launching much more interactive replies.

In addition, GPT-6 is gaining a new function best described as partial responses, letting the model respond to a query while it is still reasoning, updating along the way as it arrives at its answer.

The bigger deal for OpenAI is however the richer, interactive HTML-like responses that put pictures and diagrams right in the replies.

These can also be interactive and change as you click buttons, sub-heads or navigate a diagram, all generated on the fly.

That means you get maps for planning road trips, workable calculators for splitting bills and clickable charts for history buffs, all laid out like you were reading a presentation on the web.

The update is rolling out today with GPT-6 in chat, with Sol for the paid tiers and Luna for Free and Go. Codex and Work see no changes. The rollout is staggered and might take a while to propagate.

Read more: OpenAI’s presentation, launch post. The Verge, Wired, and MacRumors. Discussion on Hacker News and r/OpenAI.

Internal OpenAI model solves hundreds of open mathematical problems

There were 377 total problems solved, and it could take a long time for the community to process. (Picture: generated)
In what may be a watershed moment, at least in terms of quantity, the same internal model that solved the Navier-Stokes millennium problem has solved a torrent of open problems — and posted them all on GitHub.

— We are entering a new era of discovery now, Sam Altman says on X, followed by OpenAI president Greg Brockman’s comment that we are moving — towards acceleration of scientific discovery and improving quality of life for everyone.

The problems span deep and wide across the field, with solutions on anything from number theory to computer science and mathematical physics to complex geometry. There are so many solutions that OpenAI says their listings themselves are not rankings, in a document that spans 41 pages with as many as ten problems per page.

In OpenAI’s announcement, they say they have been consulting with Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence at the Institute for Advanced Study «to develop best practices» and to «inform how we release these results,» after getting backlash from the mathematical community on earlier problem releases. The group says:

— This release is the beginning, not the completion, of the process of human understanding and the incorporation of the work into mathematical knowledge.

«Many» of the proofs are formalized in Lean, which means they are computer-verifiable, with more to come «as we obtain them,» OpenAI says. Along with the proofs themselves, there are ten summaries of model reasoning and estimates on how much compute was spent to solve each problem. OpenAI says the average time spent was three hours of ChatGPT Pro-level reasoning.

— We want to directly empower scientists with state-of-the-art capabilities and are working to responsibly release the model that produced these results, OpenAI writes.

Read more: OpenAI’s presentation, GitHub repository, PDF overview, and AGMAI’s statement. NYT and Interesting Engineering. Discussion on Hacker News and r/Singularity.

Following the AI Act, ChatGPT will be getting text watermarks in the EU

It’s easy to edit away text watermarks, OpenAI says. (Picture: generated)
Even if the technology is troublesome, OpenAI says they will be adding their invisible watermarks, textGrain, to outputs «over the coming weeks» for users in the European Union.

Article 50 of the AI Act clearly states that «providers of generative AI systems» must «mark outputs in a machine-readable format» and make it detectable as «generated or manipulated.»

The verification of these watermarks is trickier, as OpenAI will only be opening the watermark detector to approved researchers and «expert organizations» to «help improve the technology.»

They also caution that the watermark detection drops profoundly for edited text and are less reliable for shorter outputs.

Watermarks won’t divulge who owns the text or is responsible for it, don’t identify the user or verify accuracy — and the lack of one doesn’t necessarily prove human authorship. OpenAI also add that watermarks don’t reveal the level of assistance, as a user could have used ChatGPT to merely proofread a text, for example.

OpenAI already provides their images and audio with invisible SynthID tags that can be checked at openai.com/verify, but it is unclear if this page will also be detecting text in the future.

Anthropic also complied with the AI Act in August, with many of the same caveats.

Read more: OpenAI’s announcement, X post. TechCrunch, The Verge, and Gizmodo.

Google delivers Gemini 4 Argon in limited release, nudging the frontier ahead

Argon does push the frontier a little, but benchmarks don’t point to a showstopper. (Picture: Google)
Their first fresh frontier model in nearly a year isn’t getting a public release just yet, it is being rolled out to «trusted cyber defenders» and government to test and harden its capabilities first.

The model is built for «complex, long-horizon workflows,» Google says, and is supposedly excels at «real-world software engineering and enterprise knowledge work.»

It is also good at cybersecurity, being able to find, validate and patch vulnerabilities, and the release to testers will be without cyber guardrails so they can test out these defenses.

Argon also slightly pushes the frontier ahead, scoring marginally better than GPT-6 Astra, Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1 in most benchmarks Google tested with, and is ahead by quite a bit on Arena.ai’s text benchmark, while coming in eighth on coding.

On the Artificial Analysis benchmark it scores a joint second behind Opus 5.5, shared with Fable 5.1 and Astra. It also hallucinates way less, at a rate of just 15% versus Fable’s 69%.

The real-world testing release is in order to protect against misuse, prompt injections, and misalignment, and to harden systems, Google says. They also say they will be monitoring Argon’s chain-of-thought throughout these «pivotal moments of increased capabilities while navigating alignment risks.» Google signed a voluntary safety agreement between industry and the White House just yesterday.

There seems no timeline for general release, but Google says it will roll out to the API and AI Ultra subscribers first, and Argon is available now to members of the Fairwind program. It costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million out.

Read more: Google’s presentation. CNBC, Ars Technica, and VentureBeat. Discussion on Hacker News and r/Singularity.

OpenAI launches Dots, a persistent, personal agent that gets to know you

Your friendly neighbourhood agent. Dots could do all your tedious work, and update in the background. (Picture: OpenAI)
Dots is OpenAI’s answer to OpenClaw and Muse. It’s an always-on agent powered by GPT-Astra that can solve tasks and do things on your behalf.

It has its own computer in the cloud and can work just like you would like it to, and the more you use it, the better it gets to know you and how you work.

Dots has something other agents will find it difficult to compete with — OpenAI’s large universe of 4,000 plugins, apps and connectors, including of course services like Teams and Slack.

Users can reach it through ChatGPT on the web or the app, through SMS messages, Slack or Teams. You can even call it on the phone.

It can also be proactive, using the tools and apps you have connected to check for progress and updates while you are offline.

Users can check on Dot’s progress at any time, and set granular limits and permissions. It can’t send messages on your behalf unless you grant it permission.

The vision for Dots is to make it contain teams of multiple agents that collaborate on tasks rather than just the one, giving users their own personal agent swarm.

To begin with, Dots is only available for Pro, Business Premium and Enterprise users (including Edu and Healthcare subscriptions) at no extra cost.

Read more: OpenAI’s presentation. Reuters, Engadget, Wired, and NYT. Discussion on Hacker News and r/Singularity.

OpenAI delays October release of Astra 6.1 due to safety, alignment concerns

GPT-6.1 Astra is postponed until OpenAI can fix alignment and authorization issues. (Picture: generated)
With DevDay around the corner on September 29, promising «20+ releases» in one day, AI followers were getting giddy at the thought of a new OpenAI model, but this now seems off for a while.

Several outlets are now reporting that the scheduled October release of GPT-6.1-Astra has been postponed due to safety and misalignment issues.

The model reportedly had problems «staying within scope,» «authorization» and «communicating» about its work, Saachi Jain, OpenAI’s head of safety systems said in a statement shown to CNN.

— Of course we want to make sure our model development is safe ​no matter whether that’s in the company, or when we ​ship it ⁠to users, Jain tells Reuters, — But when we ship it to users, we have an extremely high bar in terms of safety and alignment.

According to The Wall Street Journal, GPT-6.1 showed elevated levels of deception, and did not always disclose actions it had taken, which was worrying enough to postpone its release.

Read more: The Wall Street Journal, CNBC, CNN, and Reuters.

Anthropic’s Claude-powered biology lab makes its first scientific discovery

The repeating DNA in bacteriophages could possibly reveal a gene-editing method. (Picture: generated)
Anthropic set up its wet science lab in the spring of 2026, and it has already made its first important discovery.

Claude itself has autonomously discovered an enzyme hidden in the DNA of bacteriophages that sits beside a «long array of repeating DNA,» that could work in a similar way to CRISPR — todays most common DNA-editing tool, and a discovery that won the Nobel Prize.

Claude found the enzyme almost entirely on its own, searching through a massive database of DNA sequences for interesting candidates from a human prompt. It took 21 hours, 950 agents and 210 million tokens until an agent made the discovery of repeating DNA sequences. It was then analyzed and tested by scientists in the lab.

Continue reading “Anthropic’s Claude-powered biology lab makes its first scientific discovery”

Anthropic launches Opus 5.5 with better efficiency, alignment and cost

Anthropic is keeping its promise with external evaluators on this model, leading to better alignment. (Picture: Anthropic)
Claude Opus 5.5 is the first release since Anthropic’s pacing pledge, and has been run through external evaluators such as Frontier Design and METR.

It is the best model Anthropic has tested so far on its internal alignment tests and comes with strong safeguards inherited from Fable.

40% cheaper on typical tasks
Opus 5.5 costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million in output, 20 percent below Opus 5. Cache reads fall 60 percent to $0.20 per million tokens.

Anthropic says typical workloads cost around 40 percent less overall, while using fewer tokens per task. Output is also more than 30 percent faster.

Continue reading “Anthropic launches Opus 5.5 with better efficiency, alignment and cost”

OpenAI releases GPT-6 Sol and Luna at half the price, with better efficiency

GPT-6 Sol and Luna come just under twenty days after the launch of Astra. (Picture OpenAI/generated)
OpenAI has launched GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, bringing technology from its flagship Astra model to cheaper and faster models — while cutting API prices in half.

GPT-6 Sol costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, half the promotional price of GPT-5.6 Sol.

GPT-6 Luna drops to $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 in output.

On OpenAI’s internal factuality evaluation, GPT-6 Sol makes around half as many errors as GPT-5.6 Sol and approaches Astra. At higher reasoning levels, Luna matches GPT-5.6 Sol while costing roughly one hundredth as much, according to the company.

Continue reading “OpenAI releases GPT-6 Sol and Luna at half the price, with better efficiency”

OpenAI says RSI will better alignment and safety, calls for global standards

An AI researcher could also be a safety researcher, but there are risks, OpenAI says. (Picture: generated)
As OpenAI keeps building toward automated AI research and recursive self-improvement, they are saying there are clear benefits to their research, by rapidly accelerating AI progress and bringing down the cost, improving the lives of more people. It also comes with a warning:

— Done without appropriate care and caution, RSI could result in humans losing practical control over AI development, unable to provide oversight on research processes they no longer understand, OpenAI writes in a blog post today.

— From here, AI could become more dangerous, less aligned, and, on the whole, a danger to people, they write.

They are saying they shouldn’t pursue self-improvement unless it can be done safely, while retaining human control, and plan to have a human in the loop for automated research.

An automated AI researcher is likely by 2028 or sooner, they said earlier and presumes it can greatly help with alignment and safety on increasingly capable model releases.

With their warning of the dangers comes a plea for «International standards for safety and security practices» that they think the USA should lead, but it is unclear if their suggestions will be implemented any time soon.

They are also saying that «pacing» is not about «maintaining a predetermined speed. Technically, it is about ensuring that alignment research and deployment of that research stay ahead of capabilities.»

OpenAI is widely believed to launch new models shortly, on or before its DevDay on September 29.

Read more: OpenAI’s blog. More on standards at CNBC, Reuters, and Gizmodo.

Check out the new wire updates ↑ →

Teknotum is answering the challenge of an unprecedented news flow in the AI space with a new /Wires/ page. It is also available as a sidebar widget on desktop, linking up the latest news from external sources and updating through the day, serving as a snapshot of what is happening.

It’s a news river initially sorted by latest first, and is hopefully a quick and easy way to get oriented on the day’s AI news.

The widget is also available at the top of the mobile home page, to get you the latest first, with editorial content a little down the page.

You can also find it on teknotum.net/wires/ as a standalone page sorted by daily items with more content than is available in the widget.

Hope you like it!

Anthropic has already set up a wet lab to test biology and Claude automation

The wet lab is not intended to compete with drug discoverers, but to test the limits of lab automation. (Picture: generated)
CEO Dario Amodei said the mission is to cure cancer and most human diseases in ~5-10 years, but AI alone can’t do all the experiments «in silico,» Reuters reports.

They are saying that Anthropic already has a biology lab in San Francisco, and is working on pushing automation with Claude as far as possible.

They also hope to do pre-clinical work on diseases thought «undruggable,» meaning they are too expensive or complex to cure.

— The mission of the company is to develop powerful AI in such a way that [it] benefits the world, Anthropic’s head of life sciences, Eric Kauderer-Abrams tells Reuters. — By far, we see the biggest opportunity for that in the life sciences, and that is motivating everything that we’re doing.

That said, Anthropic also works with external lab partners for what seems a lot of their «normal» biology testing.

Read more: Reuters, TechCrunch, Engadget. Discussion on r/technology and Hacker News.

China-USA talks on Thursday expected to take on catastrophic, nuclear AI risk

The talks should first focus on catastrophic nuclear risk, experts argue. (Picture: generated)
As presidents Trump and Xi get ready for their bilateral summit in Washington next Thursday, experts and ministers on both sides are hinting as to what they might be able to agree to on AI.

China’s main concerns are about ideology, cyberattacks and government challenges, the AP says. Chen Yixin, the head of its state security ministry, also published an article last Sunday writing that AI «fundamentally transforms the military struggle» amid US AI use for targeting in Iran.

The USA might be more worried about the current existential debate and distillation, but wants to avoid shared risks, meaning there is an opening for agreement on both sides.

Continue reading “China-USA talks on Thursday expected to take on catastrophic, nuclear AI risk”

Anthropic reaches 90% AI use in model development, «leading» 26% of cases

AI use for improving models has not yet reached fully autonomous levels, but «leads» more often. (Picture: generated)
The AI lab has determined a methodology for measuring how AI is being used to build the next models, detail the extent and method of use, test their ability to intervene, and measure the resources used.

Anthropic randomly sampled 20% of research and development staff’s Claude usage for each week of July, and then used Claude to organize them. This was done using an «automation rating scale» from Epoch AI, classifying tasks from AL0, meaning no AI involvement, to AL5, which is fully autonomous AI.

They found that none of the usage reached AL5, but AL4 was 26% of the tasks — meaning AI is «leading» from «high-level prompts» with human supervision, while more than 90% of the tasks were AL3 — which is AI «collaboration» under «close human direction.»

AI «leading» is up from 1% in February 2026, and Anthropic estimates that they now have 30,000 agents in use at any time for research and engineering, that use real-time monitoring that can block «dangerous actions.» As agent use eventually grows ever larger, even rare use cases become more likely, Anthropic says.

The measure is a way of determining how close we are getting to recursive self-improvement, meaning AI writing itself, which could lead to a lack of control of the technology. Anthropic says every lab could publish such reports if there was a standard, which they hope to contribute to. They will also keep publishing these.

It’s also a step toward better third-party monitoring at Anthropic, which plans to install independent evaluators with employee-level access soon, as promised in their call for «pacing».

Read more: Anthropic’s report. Coverage on Reuters, ABC News, The Washington Post, and Bloomberg. Discussion on r/Singularity.

OpenAI reveals six more alignment breaches and will standardize reporting

OpenAI’s newly discovered alignment breaches are «concerning» but caused no harm. (Picture: generated)
After spooking the frontier labs into agreeing on «pacing» development with the Hugging Face incident, in which large swarms of misaligned agents collaborated to hack an outside server, the problem still isn’t solved, OpenAI says:

— We do not believe that the AI industry has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer, they write.

They are documenting now six new «unexpected or concerning» breaches from the last six months that in various degrees broke alignment without causing serious harm, and say they are working to develop a framework for reporting future ones.

Continue reading “OpenAI reveals six more alignment breaches and will standardize reporting”