OpenAI model discovers 948 root access vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel

Using a low-privileged account on unpatched Linux systems after this finding could be a serious security risk, OpenAI cautions. (Picture: generated)
The «upcoming cyber model» identified 2,309 candidates, validated 1,724 findings and found 1,238 Local Privilege Escalations before developing 948 actionable exploits and patches that could give root or «admin» access for regular accounts.

— Within the next few years, we believe that if there are vulnerabilities in a given software project, frontier models will likely be able to discover them and even less capable models may be able to develop exploits once disclosed, OpenAI says.

They also say that after this exploit batch, now «having access to a low-privileged account on an operating system that isn’t updated should be considered functionally equivalent to root access for a well-resourced threat actor,» underscoring the significance of these findings.

The «campaign» cost about $1,200,000 in API credits, or $1,279 per exploit, and OpenAI explains that they optimized for execution, not cost. Engineers might well build optimized agent harnesses to bring the cost substantially down, they say.

Going by the rates paid for exploits of this severity on Pwn2Own and TyphoonPWN, OpenAI reckons their findings could be valued between $19 million and $66 million, with «historical bounty amounts.»

GPT-5.5 Cyber had previously found 24 privilege escalations in June, making these discoveries about 40 times as many, even though systems had three months of hardening in between the runs.

Read more: OpenAI’s detailed presentation, X post. Discussion on Hacker News and r/Singularity

Linus Torvalds changes stance on AI coding, welcomes it on Linux

— If somebody has issues with AI, they can do the open-source thing and fork it, Linus says. (Picture: generated)
— Linux is not one of those anti-AI projects, he writes in an email to lore.kernel.org, adding that — AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it’s clearly a useful one.

He now says that AI isn’t perfect, and there are doubts about the economy of it, but that «anybody who points to the problems at AI had better be looking in the mirror and pointing at themselves at the same time. Because it’s not like natural intelligence is always all that great either.»

He goes on saying that «this is NOT some kind of «social warrior» project,» and that they use open source because «it results in better technology, not because of religious reasons.»

The top Linux kernel maintainer and founder of the entire project has not always been this kind to AI, The Register reports, shunning the technology as 90% marketing hype in 2024 and saying «I really don’t to go there.»

In his email to the kernel list, he clarifies that AI as tool was not «clear» even just a year ago, but whether «it is useful» is no longer the question.

— This is an area where where I’m willing to absolutely put my foot down as the top-level maintainer, he writes, adding that — The solution is not to put your head in the sand and sing «La La La, I can’t hear you.»

Read more: The message to lore.kernel.org, The Register. Discussion on r/Singularity.